- MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI HOW TO
- MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI REGISTRATION
- MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI SOFTWARE
- MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI TRIAL
- MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI PC
MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI PC
However, choosing Mac over PC (or the other way around) won't do much to influence your ability to produce excellent creative writing any more than choosing NVivo over Atlas.ti will alter your ability to do rigorous qualitative work. There are differences, and some experts appreciate the nuances in ways that allow for a debate of one package against another. My two cents - please note that I am not trying to offend anyone (just to examine the debate in a different way), and I'm still open to some persuasive arguments if others have different perspectives (and thanks to CAQDAS for all of the excellent and hard work in trying to map out the differences among the packages!):ĭebating Atlas.ti versus NVivo is like debating Mac versus PC. By far the majority of collaborations are text based (I suspect I will transcribe relevant parts of the lecturer audio, and just describe how students are interacting with other tools such as the whiteboard). So I suspect I will be coding contributions by the type of thinking they reflect. I'm particularly interested in analysing the ways in which different learning tasks and interface designs that are set in the virtual classroom affect the types of collaborations students conduct.
MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI TRIAL
I know this is a really broad question, but I'm sure that your intimate experience with these tools (and lack of familiarity with the data) will still be able to make a better decision than I could, because there's only so much you can pick up from reading reviews and brief experimentations with trial downloads. I have 24 lessons worth of Synchronous Virtual Classroom data (Macromedia Breeze - mainly text chat but with some whiteboard and audio overlay) that I will be analysing, mainly for the text chat.
MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI SOFTWARE
You can find the slides of the workshop here.I'm a PhD student from Australia who is trying to decide which software I should use to analyse my research data.
MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI REGISTRATION
The participation in the workshop is free and registration mode is “first come, first serve”.
If you want to participate in the workshop or if you have questions send us an e-mail to: A free demo version is available and needs to be installed for the workshop (see: ).
MAXQDA VS ATLAS.TI HOW TO
You usually work on your Mac, please bring your own laptop as there are some differences in how to use the software on Mac OS, which we willĮxplain separately. The workshop will take place at a computer room at the Institute for Advanced Studies with pre-installed ATLAS.ti ( Windows). At the end of the workshop, we will have a general discussion on how working with ATLAS.ti can be linked to your own writing and how it can (hopefully) help us work on our papers, theses, and the like. In the last part of the workshop, you will work on your own material, supported by us. In the second part of the workshop, we will introduce you to the software ATLAS.ti and show you its main features, and we will talk about basic issues such as preparing a project for the coding and analysis process, coding empirical material, and writing memos. In the first part of the workshop we will give you a short introduction to coding texts in general and the main premises of Grounded Theory as one of the major paradigms in coding empirical material. However, if you need something to work with, material will be provided by us. To make this workshop as useful as possible for each participant, we encourage you to bring your own empirical material (e.g. Specific methodological knowledge is not required. The focus of the workshop is on hands-on qualitative analysis with ATLAS.ti and becoming familiar with the software.
The workshop offers a general introduction to ATLAS.ti and aims to help you familiarise yourselves with the basic features of the programme. MaxQDA, QDAMiner, or ATLAS.ti, exist to support social scientists with the task of coding and managing empirical material. Grounded Theory, Situational Analysis, or Content Analysis, is a well established method to create a deeper understanding of social processes and phenomena. Where: Institute for Advanced Studies, Josefstädter StrViennaįor whom: Beginners in Social Science AnalysisĪnalysing empirical material through qualitative coding, e.g. When: 28th of January 2017, starting at 10:00 am, ending at around 16:00 pm (there will be breaks) Details can be found in the call below:Ĭoding Society – Introduction to computer assisted qualitative analysis with ATLAS.ti The one-day workshop is organized by Victoria Neumann, Marlene Altenhofer, and myself. I am very happy to announce that there will be a(nother) workshop on computer assisted qualitative analysis with Atlas.ti, especially for STS students in Vienna.